GSTAT Order No. 156/2026 allows Token generation until 31 July 2026, preserving appeal filing rights for 60 days where portal issues prevent filing.
SC awarded ₹8 lakh compensation, holding a missing ticket alone cannot defeat a Section 124A Railways Act claim if surrounding facts establish bona fide travel.
Madras HC set aside ITC denial as documentary evidence was not examined and the order under Section 74 followed a Section 73 show cause notice.
ITAT Ahmedabad deleted estimated brokerage additions based on inquiry registers and loose papers, holding that no corroborative evidence established brokerage income or justified additions under Sections 28 or 69A.
Chhattisgarh HC upheld CESTATs order restricting service tax demand to the normal period under Section 73(1), finding the dispute involved a bona fide interpretational issue.
Uttarakhand HC dismissed a challenge to PMLA pre-cognizance notices, holding the applicants were only called for hearing on cognizance.
SC reserved judgment on the challenge to the Bombay HC order concerning Sections 69 and 70 of the CGST Act and permitted written submissions by 17 July 2026.
Bombay HC declined to entertain an anticipatory bail application as no Section 69 CGST arrest order existed, but granted one-week protection if such order is issued.
CESTAT Chandigarh partly allowed appeals, permitting CENVAT credit where contractors did not claim service tax abatement and rejecting it where abatement was availed.
Himachal Pradesh HC dismissed both appeals, held the suit barred under Section 4 of the Benami Act, and directed the Central Government to take acquisition steps.
