Goods and Services Tax India: Read all latest GST news, articles, notification, circulars, case laws news on, MVAT DVAT PVAT GST GSTN IGST CGST GST Council GST Rates SGST GST Forms GST Rules.
Goods and Services Tax : The debate examines why GST penalties under Section 122(1A) may survive a direct challenge under Article 20(2). The key takeaway i...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that cancellation proceedings for Rule 10A violations must be initiated through FORM GST REG-31, which grants thirt...
Goods and Services Tax : The Karnataka AAR held that ITC on statutory canteen services is available only to the extent of expenses actually borne by the em...
Goods and Services Tax : E-commerce sellers generally require GST registration from their very first sale, irrespective of turnover thresholds applicable t...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that recovery from third parties cannot be initiated when only a proposed demand exists and no final tax liability ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Rajasthan GSTAT Bar has urged the Tribunal to adopt a pragmatic approach by accepting pre-deposits made through the Electronic...
Goods and Services Tax : Haryana recorded the highest State GST growth rate in India at 22% in May 2026. The achievement is attributed to strong tax admini...
Goods and Services Tax : Practitioners are reportedly following different methods while completing GSTAT appeal forms because of inadequate guidance. The r...
Goods and Services Tax : The certificate clarifies that dealing and investment in securities are outside the scope of GST. Companies engaged solely in secu...
Goods and Services Tax : Representation addressed to Union Finance Minister, GST Council and CBIC seeks legislative and administrative relief for bona fide...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala High Court set aside a consolidated notice issued for FY 2019-20 to 2024-25. It held that separate notices must be issu...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court granted interim protection after observing that proceedings under Section 73 appeared to nullify refund orders sanctione...
Goods and Services Tax : The Gauhati High Court held that partners who retained benefits from GST violations and acted behind such transactions can be pena...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that denial of input tax credit cannot be justified solely because the selling dealer failed to deposit tax, where ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that writ petitions need not continue once the GSTAT becomes operational and statutory appeal timelines are availab...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN has postponed the implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" capture and voluntary E-Way Bill closure to 1 August 2026. The ...
Goods and Services Tax : Gross GST collections reached ₹1.94 lakh crore in May 2026, registering 3.2% growth. The increase was driven largely by a 19.1% ...
Goods and Services Tax : The West Bengal GST Department ruled that intra-State movement of goods related to job work remains exempt from e-way bill generat...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN has announced mandatory capture of Ship-To GSTIN in Bill-To/Ship-To transactions under the EWB system. The change aims to imp...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN has launched a standardized Annexure-B Offline Utility for refund applications involving accumulated ITC to enable automated ...
Advocate J S Bedi Jagraon Multi Metals Vs State of Punjab (Punjab & Haryana High Court) Interim order passed by Honb. Punjab & Haryana High Court against the confiscation of goods directly u/s 130 on the ground that subsequent seller has not deposited the tax That three vehicles were detained by State Tax Officer Ludhiana […]
Casual approach of Commissioner State Taxes cannot be permitted since he is trying only to prevent payment of refund amount to petitioner.
K.Baskaran Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court) Impugned order levies interest under Section 50 as well as penalty under Section 73(9) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, over and above, reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC). Admittedly, there was no proposal in the pre-assessment notice either for levy of interest or penalty. […]
Wipro Limited India Vs Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes (Karnataka High Court) A perusal of the Invoices at Annexure-C will indicate that while supplies are made by the petitioner to M/s. ABB Global Industries and Services Private Limited, the GSTIN Number mentioned in the Invoices has been incorrectly shown as that of ABB India Limited, […]
The provisions of Section 107 of the Act deal with ‘Appeal’ and provide that an appeal be filed as against any order of the State Goods and Services Tax Act within a period of 90 days. There is a condonable period of one month after the aforesaid period of 90 days, for which the authority may grant condonation, if convinced by the explanation set out by the petitioner. The appeal of petitioner has been filed after a period of 2 months and 17 days, over and above the statutory limitation of 90 + 30 days.
Sugan Clothing Vs Assistant Commissioner of GST & CE (Madras High Court) The petitioner is an assessee under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (in short ‘Act’) and challenges an order passed by the 2nd respondent dated 05.03.2020 rejecting the request for amendment of TRAN-1. 2. I am of the considered […]
Article enlist some of the important activities to be undertaken by taxpayers to ensure GST compliance and avoid scrutiny and litigation
The power granted under section 67(1) GST Act is restricted only to the place of business whereas the power under section 67(2) GST Act is applicable to any place. Power under section 67(2) GST Act, thus, is wider in scope.
Bansal Steels Vs Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax (Delhi High Court) The petitioner had applied for cancellation of its GST registration for the first time on 04.12.2018 with effect from that date, stating that the reason for seeking such cancellation was that it had discontinued/closed its business. The said application was rejected by an […]
Kerala High Court recalls interim order in Sandeep’s review petition against State Tax Officer. Clarifies the correct interpretation of Section 112(8)(b).
