Case Law Details
K.Baskaran Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court)
Impugned order levies interest under Section 50 as well as penalty under Section 73(9) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, over and above, reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC). Admittedly, there was no proposal in the pre-assessment notice either for levy of interest or penalty. To this extent the impugned order has travelled beyond the scope of the show cause notice.
Thus, to that extent, I set aside the impugned order subject to the petitioner appearing before the respondent with a response to the show cause notice as well as to the levy of interest under Section 50 and penalty under Section 73(9) of the Act as contained in the impugned order on Thursday, 23rd March, 2023 at 10.30 a.m. without expecting any further notice in this regard.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Heard Mr.Adithya Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. T.N.C. Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent.
2. Challenge is to the proceedings of the respondent dated 24.01.20220 passed in terms of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ( in short, ‘the Act’) . Though the impugned proceedings have been concluded without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, no fault can be attributed to the officers.
3. A notice dated 08.11.2019 was issued to the petitioner to which there was no response forthcoming. Thus passing of the impugned order without reference to the petitioner is found to be in order. However, there are other legal defects.
4. The impugned order levies interest under Section 50 as well as penalty under Section 73(9) of the Act, over and above, reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC). Admittedly, there was no proposal in the pre-assessment notice either for levy of interest or penalty. To this extent the impugned order has travelled beyond the scope of the show cause notice.
5. Thus, to that extent, I set aside the impugned order subject to the petitioner appearing before the respondent with a response to the show cause notice as well as to the levy of interest under Section 50 and penalty under Section 73(9) of the Act as contained in the impugned order on Thursday, 23rd March, 2023 at 10.30 a.m. without expecting any further notice in this regard.
6.After hearing and considering the reply filed and records, if any produced, the respondents shall pass an order within a period of two weeks from 23.03.2023. It is made clear that if the petitioner does not avail the opportunity as extended under this order, then challenge to the impugned order will fail and the impugned order will stand revived without further reference to the petitioner.
7. In the result, this writ petition stands allowed to the extended indicated above. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions stand closed.
