Company Law India: Read latest Company law news & updates, acts, circular, notifications & articles issued by MCA amendment in companies Act 2013. Article on Loans Company formation XBRL, Schedule VI IFRS.
Company Law : Overview of Form STK-2 under Section 248(2), covering eligibility, ineligible companies, documents, process, filing fee and ROC pr...
Company Law : Step-by-step procedure for redemption of preference shares under Section 55, including CRR, ROC filings, statutory registers and f...
Company Law : Step-by-step procedure for altering the Object Clause under Section 13, filing Form MGT-14, and SEBI LODR compliance for listed co...
Company Law : Article explains the provisions governing appointment of proxies under Section 105 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 19 of the C...
Company Law : Legal Provision and Obligations for a company with respect to Securities issues by Private Placement This Article outlines the leg...
Company Law : MCA has cautioned stakeholders against phishing calls, WhatsApp messages, emails, fake websites, and ZIP attachments impersonating...
Company Law : ICSI has urged PESB to recognize Company Secretaries as eligible for Board-level and Functional Director positions in CPSEs. The r...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the Government to amend the law to allow Company Secretaries in Practice to appear before DRTs and DRATs. It argues...
Company Law : ICSI has urged the MCA to ensure eligible companies comply with Section 203 by appointing Whole-time Company Secretaries. The repr...
Company Law : ICSI has requested the MCA to grant compliance relaxations following technical disruptions caused by the Data Centre fire. The pro...
Company Law : NCLAT set aside directions to hand over two properties to the RP, holding Civil Court-recognised possessory rights could not be di...
Company Law : NCLAT dismissed the IRP's appeal, upheld ₹3 lakh remuneration and held reliance on K. Sashidhar was distinguishable in the fee d...
Company Law : Companies and individuals prosecuted by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) under the Companies Act, 2013 were not entit...
Company Law : NCLT Mumbai sanctioned a composite scheme under Sections 230–232 and 66 after finding statutory compliance and no objections fro...
Company Law : NCLT Chennai sanctioned the amalgamation scheme after statutory compliance, undertakings on regulatory observations, and absence o...
Company Law : ROC Cuttack imposed penalties under Section 450 for delayed filing of Form PAS-6 under Rule 9A despite subsequent compliance with ...
Company Law : ROC Cuttack imposed a ₹1.5 lakh penalty under Section 159 for possessing a duplicate DIN in violation of Section 155 despite vol...
Company Law : ROC Cuttack imposed penalties under Section 203(5) for a 48-day delay in appointing a Whole-time Company Secretary under Section 2...
Company Law : ROC Cuttack imposed penalty under Sections 203(5) and 454 for 38-day delay in appointing a Whole-Time Company Secretary by a liste...
Company Law : ROC Cuttack imposed penalty under Section 203(5) for a 23-day delay in appointing a whole-time Company Secretary by a listed compa...
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of sectio,i 620 of the Companies Act. 1956 ( I of 1956). the Central Government hereby directs that the provisions of clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 17 of the said Act read with the Companies.
directed to refer to your letter no. PD/69/90 dated 19.2.90 on the subject mentioned above and to say that the cost auditor shall be deemed to have concluded his appointment as soon as he renders a report to the Central Government in accordance with the Cost Audit Report Rules. The specified number of companies for the purpose of section 23 3B (2) of the Act
directed to refer to your letter no. CLC/79/89 dated 8th January, 1990 on the subject mentioned above and to say that while giving a certificate in terms of provision to sub-section 224 of the Companies Act, 1956, the auditor or auditors will not take into account the actual appointments as auditors in the companies but also their proposed appointment in companies for which they have given their consent.
After a careful examination of the statement made by the cost auditors, the Department is of the view that it would be more appropriate if while mentioning the figures for previous year, the Cost Auditor certifies the position by means of note that figures so stated are on the basis of information furnished by the management, for which he has obtained a certificate from them.
Under the provision of S. 233B of the Act and the Cost Audit Report Rules made thereunder, the Cost Auditor after the submission of the Cost Audit Report has to furnish replies to all the supplementaries, queries from the Department of Company affairs arising through a review of the Cost Audit Report. A question has arisen as to when the term of a Cost Auditor in respect of company shall be deemed to have concluded. It is clarified that for the purpose of furnishing the certificate under sub-section
Authentication of Cost Audit Report in cases where a firm of Cost Auditors is approved under U/s 233B (2) of the Companies Act, 1956 for conducting Cost Audit.
All the partners of the firm are practicing cost accountants within the meaning of Section 6 and 7 of the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959,
The attention of the Institute is drawn to the provisions of section 233B of the Companies Act, 1956, and the Cost Audit (Report) Rules, 1968, as amended from time to time. The duties of the cost accountants appointed to conduct an audit of cost accounts of the company flow directly from the above provisions and as such they should in strict compliance
Similarly, a question has now been raised whether a Cost Auditor of a Company can also be its internal auditor which has been carefully examined in this Department. Since the Cost Auditor is required to comment on the scope and performance of internal audit as per the provisions of the Cost Audit (Report) Rules, 1968, it would tend to mitigate against proper and dispassionate discharge
In exercise of the powers conferred by rule I91-T3 of tho Ceram! Excises Rolm 1944, the Central Government hereby makes the following further amend‑ment in the notification of the Government of India is the Ministry of Finance.
