The Tribunal held that denial of CENVAT credit on car parking and rent-a-cab services was unsustainable as the issue is settled in favour of taxpayers, leading to allowance of refund.
The Supreme Court held that the Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act does not allow an amalgamated company to claim losses of the amalgamating entity. Section 12 permits set-off only by the same assessee who incurred the loss.
A three-day delay in filing an appeal was rejected by CIT(A), but the tribunal held that minor delays should not defeat justice. The matter was remanded for decision on merits.
The Tribunal held that reopening under Section 147 was invalid where it was based on third-party search material. It ruled that Section 153C was the correct legal route, leading to deletion of additions.
The issue involved classification of an advanced brake system integrating multiple technologies. The authority ruled that it is not a part because braking can occur without it. The decision clarifies the importance of the essentiality test in classification.
Applying classification rules, the authority held that a specific heading for communication devices prevails over general classification as vehicle parts. This confirmed classification under 8517.
The issue was whether a composite assessment becomes wholly invalid. The Court held that valid and invalid portions can be separated and enforced accordingly.
The Tribunal held that a development agreement granting only a limited license for construction does not constitute transfer under section 2(47)(v). As no consideration was received, capital gains addition was deleted.
The Tribunal held that loan repayment cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68. The addition was deleted as it was based on incorrect classification of repayment as fresh loan.
The Court held that GSTIN cannot be cancelled solely based on supplier irregularities without examining the taxpayer’s transactions. The matter was remanded due to absence of independent findings.
