The Calcutta High Court held that the assessing officer misconstrued CBDT Circular No. 11 of 2024 while rejecting carry forward of loss due to a seven-day filing delay. The Court directed the authorities to condone the delay and process the return according to law.
The Delhi ITAT held that advertisement and marketing expenses could not be treated as an international transaction without evidence of an arrangement with the associated enterprise. The Tribunal deleted the transfer pricing adjustment and rejected the application of the Bright Line Test.
The NCLT Mumbai held that a director diverted rental income from corporate debtor properties through forged leave and license agreements. The Tribunal ordered refund of the diverted amounts with 12% interest and referred the matter to the IBBI for further action.
The Supreme Court dismissed an SLP challenging the Telangana High Court’s refusal to entertain a GST writ petition. The Court found no reason to interfere with the High Court’s reliance on the Glaxo Smith Kline precedent.
The Telangana High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a Section 73 GST order and attachment proceedings, holding that the matter was covered by the Supreme Court decision in Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Limited.
The Supreme Court dismissed the Revenue’s SLP after the Calcutta High Court upheld the ITAT finding that reassessment proceedings were invalid as the AO had only suspicion and no valid reason to believe income escaped assessment.
The High Court ruled that reopening under Sections 147 and 148 was unsustainable because the Assessing Officer’s reasons amounted only to suspicion and not a valid reason to believe income had escaped assessment.
The Gujarat AAR refused to answer questions regarding documentary proof and invoice endorsement for SEZ zero-rated supplies. The Authority held that such issues do not fall within the categories permitted under Section 97 of the CGST Act.
The Gujarat AAR held that AAC bricks cannot be classified under Chapter 69 as ceramic products because the autoclaving process does not satisfy the firing requirement prescribed for ceramic goods. The ruling classified AAC bricks under Heading 6810 as articles of cement or concrete.
Gujarat AAR held that ITC on construction of a concrete VCV tower used for EHV cable manufacturing is admissible because the structure functions as foundational and structural support for plant and machinery under Section 17 of the CGST Act.
