Investment made by the assessee in another company is on capital account and further, when loss incurred on account of diminishing in value of said investment is capital in nature and thus, same cannot be claimed as deduction u/s.37(1) of the Act.
Vedika Realty Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) It is well settled law, the mere filing of appeal is not sufficient until and unless, it is effectively pursued and prosecuted. From the record, orders passed by the authorities below specifically by the Ld. Commissioners and the facts of the case, the conduct of the Assessee […]
NBK Infrastructure P. Ltd Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi) The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Hari Gopal Singh Vs. CIT 258 ITR 85 held that when the additions are made on estimate basis that by itself does not lead to the conclusion that the assessee either concealed the particulars of his […]
Vimlesh Bansal Vs Ashok Kumar (Rajasthan High Court) The legal maxim ‘Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt’ literally translates to ‘the law assists only those who are vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights’. The said legal maxim applies squarely to the present case where applicants did not take recourse of law available to […]
Adilakshmi Srungavarapu Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam) Admitted facts are that the husband of the assessee in order to retain the property got the property registered in the assessee’s name and has repaid the loans borrowed by him by sale of gold jewellery and personal savings of the assessee. We also find merit in the argument […]
Spinks Impex Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Hon’ble Apex court in the matter of PCIT vs. Aarham Softronics [2019] 102 com 343 (SC), pronounced on 20-02-2019. Wherein, it was held an assessee availing exemption of 100% tax on setting up of a new industry, which is admissible for 5 years, and either on the expiry of […]
Joharimal High School Vs ITO (ITAT Cuttack) Undisputedly rather admittedly, the assessee does not enjoy registration u/s.12AA of the Act and as per e-return filed before the Bench, as per column 3, the assessee has shown receipt of income of Rs.97,10,521/- and as per column 4(i), amount applied during the previous year or expenditure incurred […]
DCIT Vs Vinod Chimanlal Modi (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is observed that sufficient documentary evidence was placed on record by the assessee before the learned CIT(A) to establish that M/s. S.S. Enterprises is a proprietary concern of M/s. Gunesh India Pvt. Ltd. and on the basis of the same, a finding was recorded by the leaned […]
Chandra Udyog Vs Assistant Commissioner, CGST & CX (Calcutta High Court) By this writ petition petitioners have challenged the impugned order of rejection of petitioners’ claim of refund of excess balance of cash ledger being annexure P/6 to the writ petition on the basis of the show cause notice dated 10th May, 2022 as appears […]
ITO Vs Jitendra Shanabhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad) CIT(A) observed that there was no large number of purchase and sale of land by the assessee. In fact, the acquisition of agricultural land owned by the assessee was done by the Government and thus Section 10(37) of the Act are attracted. As regards consideration of the rural […]
