NBK Infrastructure P. Ltd Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi) The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Hari Gopal Singh Vs. CIT 258 ITR 85 held that when the additions are made on estimate basis that by itself does not lead to the conclusion that the assessee either concealed the particulars of his […]
Vimlesh Bansal Vs Ashok Kumar (Rajasthan High Court) The legal maxim ‘Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt’ literally translates to ‘the law assists only those who are vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights’. The said legal maxim applies squarely to the present case where applicants did not take recourse of law available to […]
Adilakshmi Srungavarapu Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam) Admitted facts are that the husband of the assessee in order to retain the property got the property registered in the assessee’s name and has repaid the loans borrowed by him by sale of gold jewellery and personal savings of the assessee. We also find merit in the argument […]
Spinks Impex Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Hon’ble Apex court in the matter of PCIT vs. Aarham Softronics [2019] 102 com 343 (SC), pronounced on 20-02-2019. Wherein, it was held an assessee availing exemption of 100% tax on setting up of a new industry, which is admissible for 5 years, and either on the expiry of […]
Joharimal High School Vs ITO (ITAT Cuttack) Undisputedly rather admittedly, the assessee does not enjoy registration u/s.12AA of the Act and as per e-return filed before the Bench, as per column 3, the assessee has shown receipt of income of Rs.97,10,521/- and as per column 4(i), amount applied during the previous year or expenditure incurred […]
DCIT Vs Vinod Chimanlal Modi (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is observed that sufficient documentary evidence was placed on record by the assessee before the learned CIT(A) to establish that M/s. S.S. Enterprises is a proprietary concern of M/s. Gunesh India Pvt. Ltd. and on the basis of the same, a finding was recorded by the leaned […]
Chandra Udyog Vs Assistant Commissioner, CGST & CX (Calcutta High Court) By this writ petition petitioners have challenged the impugned order of rejection of petitioners’ claim of refund of excess balance of cash ledger being annexure P/6 to the writ petition on the basis of the show cause notice dated 10th May, 2022 as appears […]
ITO Vs Jitendra Shanabhai Patel (ITAT Ahmedabad) CIT(A) observed that there was no large number of purchase and sale of land by the assessee. In fact, the acquisition of agricultural land owned by the assessee was done by the Government and thus Section 10(37) of the Act are attracted. As regards consideration of the rural […]
Hemera India Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT held that once the revenue admitted that they were consultancy charges paid for introduction of client then that would fall in the definition of payments made to intermediary or liaison agents for channelizing, arranging or soliciting work order. There is no finding whatsoever that any inquiry […]
Admittedly, no limitation is provided for filing an appeal under Section 3G(5) of National Highways Act, 1956. Therefore, it can be construed, as held in the aforesaid judgments, that Article 137 of the Limitation Act would stand applicable to such cases.
