In this case AO has not applied his own mind before issuing notice and to arrive at conclusion that assessee has escaped an income and made addition on the basis of report submitted by Investigation Wing. So, Learned AO issued notice purely on borrowed satisfaction. In our considered opinion, in such case addition cannot be made.
Books were never rejected by Assessing Officer and thus business loss cannot be disallowed without taking cognizance of all relevant aspect of matter
Hike in GST rate as Change-in-Law: w.r.t. RE power projects, wherein the last date of bid submission was on or before September 30, 2021, i.e. on or before the issuance of notification regarding increase in GST rate for specified renewable energy devices and parts for their manufacture from 5% to 12%
Commissioner, Trade Tax Vs Radico Khetan Ltd (Supreme Court) Section 34 of U.P. Trade Tax Act shall be applicable only in a case where there is a transfer of immovable property belonging to the original assesee, during the pendency of any proceedings under the Act with the intention of defrauding any such tax or other […]
Meghna Clearing and Forwarding P. Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai) In the present case the concern clerk admitted his mistake and sought for a lenient view in the matter. As per Section 58 of the Indian Evidence Act facts admitted by the parties or their agents are not required to be proved in […]
Considering the fact that the prosecution could not point out as to how much amount is misappropriated under the Input Tax Credit and that material part of investigation is not done, more particularly, when the GST Officer has not lodged any complaint or FIR against the applicant for any misappropriation of the Government funds or State Exchequer.
Sureshbhai Ramanbhai Prajapati Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) 1. This application has been filed under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for regular bail in connection with FIR No. 11191043220204 of 2022 registered with Shahpur Police Station, Ahmedabad City for offences punishable under sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 201 […]
Amendments to Rebate of State and Central Taxes and Levies (RoSCTL) Scheme vide Circular No. 22/2022-Customs dated 26th of September, 2022. Circular No. 22/2022-Customs No. CBIC-140605/13/2021-O/o Dir(Drawback)-CBEC Government of India Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (Drawback Division) ***** New Delhi, dated the 26th of September, 2022 To […]
Securities and Exchange Board of India PR No. 28/2022 Modalities related to Investment Adviser applications SEBI, vide circular ref. 2021/579 dated June 18, 2021, granted recognition to BSE Administration and Supervision Ltd. (BASL), a wholly owned subsidiary of BSE to act as an Investment Adviser Administration and Supervisory Body (IAASB) for a period of three […]
Foods and Inns Ltd Vs Union of India (Andhra Pradesh High Court) The question that arises for consideration in the present writ petition is: Whether the authorities were right in charging GST, in respect of ‘Mango Pulp’, @ 18%? It is to be noted here that on an application made by the petitioner before the […]
