In re Multi-Verse Technologies Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Karnataka) Applicant is engaged in the business of providing computer software application services designed to run on digital devices such as mobile phones, tablets, personal computers in the state of Karnataka and the said services are meant for facilitating business transactions of supply of goods or services […]
The Company has not maintained its registered office pursuant to sub-section (1) and (4) of Section 12 of the Act w.e.f. 23.12.2021 (date of spot inspection conducted by this office) thereby attracting penal provisions under sub-section (8) of Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013. The offence is of serious nature since non-maintenance of registered […]
Whether the ‘Operational Creditor’ can change the ‘date of default’ by confining the invoices to a later period, when the Demand Notice under section 8 includes all the invoices from the date of default and the ‘debt amount’ is crystallized based on the invoices.
RKR. Gold P. Ltd Vs ACIT (Madras High Court) The criminal investigation wing is separate and distinct from the assessment wing and disclosure made before one wing will not exonerate the petitioner from the requirement of making a ‘full and true disclosure’ before the assessing officer in assessment. In fact, the apparent difference in the […]
It is the case on behalf of the Revenue that it was a case of wrong mentioning of the Section and the case would fall under Section 114(i) of the Customs Act. It is pointed out that, in the show cause notice, there was a reference to Section 114(i) or 114(iii) of the Customs Act. It is submitted that therefore on mere wrong mentioning of Section, the levy of penalty shall not fail.
Surinder Kumar Malhotra Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) The relevant facts of the case are that qua the Long Term Capital Gain available to the assessee in the year under consideration deduction u/s 54 of the Act was claimed. The said claim was disallowed holding that the proceeds have been applied to acquiring two separate properties. […]
The request to repatriate the assigned capital shall be submitted by the Foreign Reinsurer, who is engaged in reinsurance business through a branch established in India, justifying the reasons for such request;
Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd Vs State of U.P (Allahabad High Court) 1. In all these writ petitions seizure orders and notices issued under sections 129 (1) and (3), respectively, by various authorities, mainly on the ground that E-Way Bill-01 under U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 (hereinafter referred to as U.P.G.S.T ACT) […]
R.P. Polypacks Pvt. Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In brief, the issue according to the ld. Commissioner is that the assessee had made provision of Excise Duty, which was not an allowable expenditure and ld. Assessing Officer has erred in accepting this claim of the assessee in an assessment order passed under section 143(3) of […]
Dipali Electronics Pvt. Ltd Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) In our view, when Petitioner has been accused of having played role in the procurement of electronic systems and parts for manufacture of automated teller machines and Petitioner has been imposed penalty of Rs.Seventy Five Lakhs under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 […]
