Bhawneshwar Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) In the instant case, the matter relates to claim of interest paid by the assessee to the partnership firm where the assessee is a partner and from where the assessee also draws the remuneration. Both the interest paid and remuneration received from the partnership firm has been duly reflected […]
ACIT Vs Exclusive Motors Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi) Undisputedly, the assessing officer has concluded that part of the remittances made by assessee to CCPL towards extended warranty services are in the nature of profit attributable to the PE in India, hence, assessee was required to deduct tax at source on such remittances. He also held […]
Jones Lang Lasalle Building Operations Pvt Ltd Vs Celebration City Projects Pvt Ltd (NCLT Delhi) This is an application filed by the real estate allottee to the Corporate Debtor, whose claim was rejected by the Resolution Professional on the ground that she ceases to be a real estate allottee on account of an arbitral award […]
DCIT Vs Voestalpine VAE VKN India Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi) The assessee company has claimed an expenditure of Rs.2,41,98,983/- on account R & D Expenditure under the head of manufacturing expenditure. We have perused the details which have been enclosed at page no. 80 of the paper book. The same was also before the revenue […]
ITAT Mumbai remits the case to AO, grants Antonio Munroe another opportunity to substantiate challenges against Assessment and denied credits. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.
Narendra Kumar Gupta Vs State of Kerala (Kerala High Court) The points to be decided is whether the appellant had the right to avail input tax against the purchase items effected after a period of 90 days. The dealer had paid tax on the goods purchased from a registered dealer for sale within the State […]
Euro Home Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) CIT(A) held that the provisions of Sec.44AD would not apply to commission income and the rental income received would be assessed under Income from House Property. Accordingly, the appeal was dismissed against which the assessee is in further appeal before us. ITAT find that commission income would not come […]
Due to paucity of time, the urgency and considering various factors that go into finalizing the transaction, the assessee was forced to accept cash to go ahead with the execution of the sale deed. The above facts clearly stipulated a `reasonable cause’ as mandated u/s 273B of the I.T.Act for violation of the provisions of section 269SS of the I.T.Act.
Culver Max Entertainment Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) – validity of assessment order passed in the name of a Non-existing entity.
CESTAT find that cenvat credit was denied to appellant on the ground that service tax was paid by appellant as a recipient whereas, it was supposed to be paid by service provider
