The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs in India has received concerns about the suspension of Customs Broker licenses, even when it may not be warranted. This practice can have disruptive consequences, particularly for small enterprises. Regulation 16 of the CBLR, 2018 provides the Commissioner of Customs with the power to suspend licenses in […]
CESTAT Kolkata judgment, where Micky Metals Limited successfully challenged a claim of clandestine removal based solely on discrepancies in audit report and ER-1 return figures. Understand the implications and insights from the case ruling.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules that voluntary contributions received towards a trust’s corpus by an unregistered trust under Section 12A are capital receipts and therefore, not taxable. Explore more about this landmark decision.
Institute of Cost Accountants of India has officially constituted the Greater Noida Chapter, covering the area of Greater Noida in Uttar Pradesh.
Detailed review and implications of CESTAT Ahmedabads judgment in the case of West Coast Pharmaceutical Works Ltd Vs C.C.E.-Ahmedabad.
Explore the landmark CESTAT Ahmedabad order on whether service tax is applicable to software activation charges under Business Auxiliary Service in the case of Avaya Global Connect Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST
A detailed analysis of the Bombay High Court’s judgment in the case of PCIT Vs Dharmanandan Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. regarding the legitimacy of claiming depreciation on revalued assets.
Explore our in-depth analysis of the recent ITAT Bangalore ruling on Veereshayya Angadi Vs ITO case, focusing on the issue of penalty for excessive refund claims influenced by a tax consultant.
The recent ruling by CESTAT on Chandigarh Transport Corporation Vs Commissioner of Central Excise has declared that the collection of Adda fee by transport corporations as part of statutory functions does not amount to “Business Auxiliary Service” (BAS).
The recent ITAT Delhi decision in the case of Karamveer Singh Vs ITO emphasises the non-taxability of immovable property bought through funds gifted by relatives. Explore the case’s specifics, implications, and outcomes here.
