A comprehensive analysis of the case Bombay Fluid Systems Components Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs, where CESTAT quashed the classification of stainless steel tube fittings under the Customs Tariff Act.
Delve into CESTAT Bangalore’s decision in Asianet Satellite Communication Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs, where the tribunal quashed the original classification of ‘Line Extender’ as a Broadcast Signal Amplifier.
CESTAT held that Commissioner (Appeals) had overstepped his bounds by reviewing a Tribunal’s order that had already gained finality due to lack of appeal. Department’s selective application of review processes was criticized as a mockery of judicial process.
The Madras High Court recently dismissed Writ Petitions filed by Ambika Timber Depot, Sree Ashapura Saw Mill & Sree Laxmi Narayana Timbers Private Ltd seeking a legal opportunity for virtual cross-examination in a Personal Hearing due to non-appearance of transporters.
Insightful analysis of the recent case between the Commissioner of Customs and Doosan Infracore India Pvt. Ltd., where CESTAT Chennai dismissed the appeal of the revenue department on the sanction of the SAD refund claim.
Examination of the case between Tripoto Travel Private Limited and the ACIT, where ITAT directed re-adjudication on the income tax deduction claim for late deposit of employees’ contributions to PF/ESI.
Explore the CESTAT Hyderabad ruling favoring Jindal Stainless Limited in a pivotal case against the Commissioner of Customs. The case discusses the rejection of a refund claim due to Covid-19-related filing delays.
Greenstar Fertilizers Limited wins case against ACIT in ITAT Chennai, clarifying that payments made to dealers for sales of fertilizers are rebates, not subject to TDS.
Review the case between Lotus Integrated Logistics and the Commissioner of Customs where CBLR violations didn’t result in license revocation or max penalty.
Delve into the latest Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi’s judgement on the case of DCIT Vs Vinod Kumar Bajaj, discussing the illegality of income determination based on conjecture and presumption.
