This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Deduction u/s. 54F not available on unutilized consideration not deposited in specified accounts before due date
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Humayun Suleman Merchant Vs. Chief CIT (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Humayun Suleman Merchant Vs. Chief CIT (Bombay High Court)
Mandate of section 54F(4) is clear that amount which has not been utilized in construction and/or purchase of property before filing the return of income, must necessarily be deposited before that date in an account duly notified by the Central Government, so as to be exempted. As assessee had not complied with mandatory provision, AO was justified in restricting exemption under section 54F.
FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT JUDGMENT / ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:-
This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for sho...
