Case Law Details
Case Name : Humayun Suleman Merchant Vs. Chief CIT (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : IT Appeal No. 545 of 2002
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/08/2016
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Bombay High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Humayun Suleman Merchant Vs. Chief CIT (Bombay High Court)
Mandate of section 54F(4) is clear that amount which has not been utilized in construction and/or purchase of property before filing the return of income, must necessarily be deposited before that date in an account duly notified by the Central Government, so as to be exempted. As assessee had not complied with mandatory provision, AO was justified in restricting exemption under section 54F.
FULL TEX Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.