Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Humayun Suleman Merchant Vs. Chief CIT (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Humayun Suleman Merchant Vs. Chief CIT (Bombay High Court) Mandate of section 54F(4) is clear that amount which has not been utilized in construction and/or purchase of property before filing the return of income, must necessarily be deposited before that date in an account duly notified by the Central Government, so as to be exempted. As assessee had not complied with mandatory provision, AO was justified in restricting exemption under section 54F. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT JUDGMENT / ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:- This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031