Attention is invited to the RBI notification ref. no. MPD.BC.187/07.01.279/1999-2000 dated July 07, 1999. As per the notification, banks were advised to submit a fortnightly return on FRA/IRS to Monetary Policy Department with a copy to various RBI departments.
We advise that the Capital Small Finance Bank Limited has been included in the Second Schedule to the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 vide Notification DBR.PSBD.No.5201/16.02.001/2016-17 dated November 8, 2016, and published in the Gazette of India (Part III – Section 4) dated February 4- February 10, 2017.
Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby determines rate of exchange of conversion of each of foreign currencies WEF 17th February, 2017.
Non-resident taxable person, input service distributor, person paying tax under composite levy scheme, deducting TDS/collecting TCS are not required to furnish the details regarding inward /outward supply of goods & services, credit availed, tax paid. Return is to be filed on or before 20th day of the succeeding month.
Employees Enrolment Campaign 2017 offers opportunity to employers to voluntarily declare details of all employees. EPFO settles 19,114 grievances in January, 2017
GST is a destination based tax on consumption of goods or services. It is also the policy of the Government of India to export the goods and/or services not the taxes out of India. This makes the exports cheaper and thus Indian products or services will be more competitive in the international markets.
The foremost important and crucial definition under MGL is of SUPPLY. The taxable event under GST shall be the supply of goods and /or services made for consideration in the course or furtherance of business.
These are the appeals filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A), Mumbai, for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2007-08, in the matter of order passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 153C of I.T.Act.
It is an admitted position that theft/ fraud had indeed taken place in the assessee company and the AO had nowhere doubted the fact of fraud but he disallowed the claim of the assessee for the reason that the assessee could not establish the fact of fraud like non- production of copy of FIR and not taking any legal action against the employee who was involved in this activity of fraud.
The writ petitioner in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution is aggrieved by the refusal – by the respondents i.e. the income tax authorities -to release the jewellery – approximately 319. 98 g, seized by them in the course of search proceedings under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter the Act).