Follow Us:

25% Pre-Deposit was required for discrepancy In GSTR-3B and Form 26AS u/s 203AA of Income Tax

January 2, 2025 852 Views 0 comment Print

Assessee was registered under GST Act, had its original GSTIN cancelled in September 2018 and was later assigned a new GSTIN in September 2019. Assessee had filed its monthly returns in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B through the common portal.

Failure to respond to Income Tax Notice was accepted considering Pathology Reports submitted by assessee

January 1, 2025 396 Views 0 comment Print

Assessment and penalty orders issued against assessee was set aside considering pathology reports of assessee as a valid reason for failing to respond to various income tax notices.

Technical support service rendered online to foreign companies were ‘Export Of Service’ and not Intermediary service, refund of Rs. 16.8 Cr was allowable

January 1, 2025 684 Views 0 comment Print

CIT (Appeals) held that assessee qualified as an ‘intermediary,’ making the services rendered ineligible for classification as ‘Export of Services’ under the Service Tax Rules, 1994.

Dissimilar Firms were excluded from selected comparables while doing TP analysis u/s 92

January 1, 2025 744 Views 0 comment Print

The court held that the other three companies were also carrying out large-scale projects compared to assessee, making them unsuitable for comparison or setting industry standards.

No addition for NRI investment in mutual funds as the same was legitimate

December 31, 2024 1224 Views 0 comment Print

AO had made the addition with the observation that no response was received from assessee. Based on that, he proceeded to complete the assessment u/s 144 based on the information available on his record.

Addition of ₹ 9 Lakh was treated as unexplained for unexplained cash deposits

December 31, 2024 4326 Views 1 comment Print

Assessee had filed his income tax return for A.Y. 2017-18 declaring ₹20,89,430. The case was scrutinized for capital gains from agricultural land sales and cash deposits during demonetization.

Last opportunity of hearing provided in case of mismatch between GSTR 3B And GSTR 9C

December 31, 2024 1707 Views 0 comment Print

The impugned order was challenged on the premise that neither the show cause notices nor the impugned order of assessment had been served by tendering to assessee or by registered post, instead it was uploaded in the common portal.

No writ petition was allowable if assessee could avail GST Department’s effective adjudication of matter

December 31, 2024 918 Views 0 comment Print

It was held that writ courts did not interfere in cases where statutory remedies were available unless there was a clear violation of fundamental rights, lack of jurisdiction, or procedural perversity leading to manifest injustice.

GST Officer must consider reply even if filed by assessee after multiple reminders

December 31, 2024 1392 Views 0 comment Print

The impugned order was issued thereafter on 29.04.2024. Assessee referred to the impugned order and pointed out that the reply was not considered by the proper officer because such reply was filed after four opportunities of personal hearing.

No denial of FTC claim due to procedural delay in filing Form 67

December 31, 2024 1404 Views 0 comment Print

Although Rule 128(9) requires Form 67, assessee’s compliance within this rule during the rectification stage demonstrated a good faith or effort to fulfil procedural requirement.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031