The ITAT Chennai has upheld the addition of unexplained cash deposits for Sucram Pharmaceuticals, citing a lack of proof for alleged debt recoveries and scrap sales.
Delhi ITAT rules on delayed PF/ESI deposits, distinguishing between periods before and after the Checkmate Services case. Learn when disallowances are valid under Section 143(1).
The ITAT Bangalore has deleted a ₹27 lakh addition to a wife’s income, ruling it was double taxation as her husband had already declared the full capital gains.
Mumbai ITAT rules 10% tolerance limit under Section 50C is retrospective from 2003, deleting an addition. It also allows deduction for stamp duty paid by seller.
Cochin ITAT remanded ₹25 lakh addition, holding CIT(A) erred by invoking Section 68 without notice. Matter sent back for fresh adjudication after hearing assessee.
Delhi High Court ruled that a penalty under Section 271E was time-barred, clarifying that limitation period begins with Assessing Officer’s initiation.
Ahmedabad ITAT deletes a penalty under Section 270A for a deduction on education cess. The court ruled the claim was bona fide and not a case of misreporting.
The ITAT Ahmedabad has deleted a Rs.5.21 crore addition to income, ruling that the reassessment was invalid due to a lack of independent verification of the evidence.
ITAT Jodhpur quashes a rectification order, ruling a CIT(A) cannot change a decision under the guise of rectifying a mistake apparent from the record.
The ITAT Bangalore has condoned a 353-day appeal delay and set aside an ex parte order, emphasizing that the cause of the delay matters more than its length.
