Delhi High Court held that addition of demonetization cash deposit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash credit rightly deleted by CIT(A) since source of deposit duly explained with documentary evidence. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
NCLT Chennai held that application u/s. 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code admitted for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] against Corporate Applicant since there is a default in the repayment of debt and the petition filed u/s. 10 is complete.
In Weston Electronics, the reduction on the rate of sales tax on television sets manufactured within the State to 1% whereas television sets imported from outside the State of Gujarat being at 10% was held to be discriminatory in nature and therefore, struck down.
Allahabad High Court held that initiation of proceedings under section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act cannot be reason for provisional attachment. Accordingly, provisional attachment notices quashed due to lack of specific reasoning.
ITAT Indore held that reopening of assessment done by Assessing Officer under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, based on tax audit report already available during original assessment, without any fresh and new material is invalid and liable to be quashed.
NCLT Mumbai held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC] filed by Vrushvik Entertainment Private Limited (Financial Creditor) for initiation of CIRP against Filoura Big Broadcasting Pvt. Ltd., (Corporate Debtor) admitted as debt and default proved.
Delhi High Court held that CLAT(PG) examination is conducted for purposes of making admission to Post Graduate courses and not for offering public employment. Accordingly, NHAI recruitment criteria on the merit in CLAT (PG) is legally untenable and hence quashed.
ITAT Chandigarh held that disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act set aside since own funds and reserves of the assessee are more than sufficient to cover the investment made during the year. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Chandigarh held that execution of Joint Development Agreement [JDA] doesn’t constitute transfer of capital asset which would result in earning of capital gain. Accordingly, addition is deleted and appeal is allowed.
ITAT Hyderabad held that assessment order passed by AO in old PAN cannot be survived if transactions reported by DGFT in old PAN is already reported by assessee in new PAN. Accordingly, matter restored back to re-verify.
