This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Amount already disclosed before Settlement Commission cannot be added against u/s. 68
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- PCIT Vs R B Farms And Estates Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
PCIT Vs R B Farms And Estates Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Delhi High Court held that addition of unsecured loans under section 68 of the Income Tax Act rightly deleted since the said amount is already disclosed before Income Tax Settlement Commission. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
Facts- The present appeal has been preferred by the revenue. Notably, CIT(A) had allowed the Assessee’s appeal and set aside the additions made by the Assessing Officer u/s. 68 of the Act on account of unsecured loans reflected as ‘Receipts’ from two entities – M/s Earthworks Metallurgicals ...




