The application preferred by the petitioner for recall of the said order was also rejected by the Supreme Court vide order dated 25.10.2019. It is thereafter that petitioner-assessee preferred a review petition.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that cancellation of GST registration for entire places of business for non-submission of NOC by landowner of additional place of business is complete non-application of mind. Accordingly, cancellation of GST registration not justified.
Delhi High Court, in the case of smuggling of Methaqualone denied the bail application since threshold of Section 37 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [NDPS Act] not having been crossed.
A search was conducted on the premises of the Assessee on 17.10.2000 and a debit card of the overseas bank – Barclays Bank, PLC St.40, Birmingham, London, United Kingdom was found in the joint name of the Assessee and his wife (Smt. Jyoti Jaggi).
The present appeal under Section 28KA of the Customs Act, 1962 has been preferred by the appellant i.e. Vivo Mobile India Private Limited assailing the order dated 13.12.2023 passed by the Customs Authority of Advance Rulings.
Held that the requirement of ensuring uniformity and consistency in tax assessments cannot be overlooked, especially while categorizing the nature of the activity carried on by an assessee to earn its income for the purposes of taxation.
Assistant Commissioner, however, rejected the benefit of the Notification No.52/2003-Cus. dated 31.03.2003. Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the order of the adjudicating authority. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed.
The CIT(A) has also not given any independent finding after verifying that whether there is an actual syncronised trading between the assessee and that of company scrip i.e. M/s. Radhe Developers Ltd.
There is nothing which would indicate that the petitioner had received any consideration from the Government, the KIIFB or the General Education Department as consideration for the supply of goods or services.
Delhi High Court held that non-satisfaction of conditions for reopening assessment u/s. 153C of the Income Tax Act doesn’t prohibit AO from taking recourse u/s. 147. Thus, reopening u/s. 147 based on information from investigation wing justified.
