Telangana High Court held that passing of assessment order without considering the defence of the petitioner and without giving reasons for not accepting defence of the petitioner is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, directed to re-consider the matter.
CESTAT Chennai held that when the benefit of an exemption Notification is claimed, the claimant has to necessarily fulfil all the conditions prescribed under the said beneficial Notification.
Supreme Court directs various responsible ministries to jointly constitute a Committee comprising subject experts to consider the desirability of recommending a legal framework for the benefit, protection and regulation of the rights of domestic workers.
Therefore, the procedure that is required to be completed for issuance of notice under Section 148 of the Act is required to be completed prior to the expiry of the time limit as prescribed under Section 149(1) of the Act.
Bombay High Court held that the management representative cannot be treated as legally trained mind for enabling an outsider practicing Advocate to defend Respondent-workman in the domestic enquiry. Accordingly, order of industrial court is liable to be set aside.
ITAT Chennai held that addition under section 69 towards unaccounted gold and silver jewellery set aside relying on CBDT instruction no. 1916 dated 11.05.1994. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee allowed.
Kerala High Court held that recovery of tax arrears by income tax department from property that was already auctioned by Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 [KGST] to realize tax payable under KGST is untenable in the eye of law.
Delhi High Court held that license fees paid to M/s. Remfry & Sagar for use goodwill vested in the company is allowable as deduction under section 37 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, appeal of the revenue dismissed.
Held that while considering the term “unfair trade practice”, this Court has found that such one-sided Agreements, as in the present case, would be covered by the definition of term “unfair trade practice”.
ITAT Delhi held that Long Term Capital Gain [LTCG] earned from transaction in penny stock is liable for addition. Accordingly, appeal of assessee dismissed and order of CIT(A) being well reasoned is upheld.
