Follow Us:

Same view should continue to prevail for subsequent year also unless there is material change in the facts

May 18, 2012 1510 Views 0 comment Print

The judgment of Hon’ble Delhi High Court rendered in the case of Neo Poly Pack Ltd. (supra) is squarely applicable in the present case because in that case it was held that , for the sake of consistency, the same view should continue to prevail for subsequent year also unless there is material change in the facts.

A person who preferred his evidence on affidavit, need not make oral deposition in court, before the accused is summoned or required to cross-examine

May 18, 2012 2858 Views 0 comment Print

Having gone through the judgment relied upon by the learned counsel for the petitioner, we find that the same is wholly inapplicable to this case. In Mandvi Coop. Bank’s case (supra) the accused on being summoned under Section 145(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, raised the plea, that inspite of the complainant having filed his evidence by way of an affidavit under Section 145(1), the complainant must be orally examined in chief all over again,

Deduction u/s 80HHC under provisions of S.115JB will be limited to relief certified by CA

May 17, 2012 2159 Views 0 comment Print

If the dichotomy between eligibility of profit and deductibility of profit is not kept in mind then section 115JB will cease to be a self-contained code. In Section 115JB, as in section 115JA, it has been clearly stated that relief will be computed u/s 80HHC (3)/(3A), subject to the conditions under sub-sections (4) and (4A) of that Section.

Rule 8D prospective and applicable on and from the A.Y. 2008-09

May 17, 2012 3793 Views 0 comment Print

A.O. has applied Rule 8D holding that Rule 8D is retrospective in nature. It is now settled that Rule 8D is prospective and is applicable on and from the A.Y. 2008-09. We direct the A.O. to recalculate the disallowance, if any, without applying Rule 8D on the dividend income shown at Rs..4,00,039/-. The A.O. is further directed to verify the contention of the appellant that the investments have not been made out of borrowed capital, after giving the appellant an opportunity of being heard.

80G approval to be valid in perpetuity even if assessee files an application for renewal

May 17, 2012 20667 Views 0 comment Print

Approval u/s. 80G once granted shall continue to be valid in perpetuity unless and until a show-cause notice is issued by the concerned CIT showing his intention to withdraw already granted such approval.

Due Date for payment of Employee Provident Fund (EPF)

May 17, 2012 473697 Views 52 comments Print

Due date for payment of Provident Fund contributions is 15 days from the end of month in which wages are paid (plus grace period of 5 days). Thus, if wages pertaining to April’ 2012 is paid on, say, 7th May’ 2012, due date for payment of Provident Fund contribution is 20th June’ 2012 [i.e. 15th June’ 2012 as increased by grace period of 5 days].

Expense on Foreign Tours not out of business exigency not allowable

May 17, 2012 1197 Views 0 comment Print

In order to claim deduction the assessee has to prove by adducing cogent evidence that it was incurred on account of business activities of the company. It appears as rightly pointed out by the respondent that despite opportunity being given, it could not produce any materials that such foreign tour was undertaken in relation to the business of the company. Mere furnishing information and making of statement are not good enough to establish the case of foreign travel.

Baba Ramdev’s trust to Pay Tax on manufacture and sale of medicines

May 17, 2012 1234 Views 0 comment Print

Yoga guru Baba Ramdev’s trusts have been told they owe the government Rs. 58 crore in taxes against their income, largely from the sale of ayurvedic medicines. The Income Tax Department has calculated the taxes against an income of Rs. 120 crore from commercial activities.

Provisions of Section 14A & Rule 8D constitutionally valid

May 17, 2012 1356 Views 0 comment Print

Disallowance under section 14A has to be made in accordance with the principle laid down by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Godrej & Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. Mumbai. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income . Rule 8D should not be applied and the AO has to adopt a reasonable basis or method consistent with all relevant facts and circumstances and after affording reasonable opportunity to the assessee to place all germane material on the record.

CS Students Can Download Admit Card For June 2012 Examination after 19th May 2012

May 17, 2012 1910 Views 0 comment Print

Attention Students: Please Download Your Admit Card For June 2012 Session Of Examination after 19th May 2012

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930