Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs. Flex Foods Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 4880 & 4881/Del/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/04/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2003- 04 & 2004- 05
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

If the dichotomy between eligibility of profit and deductibility of profit is not kept in mind then section 115JB will cease to be a self-contained code. In Section 115JB, as in section 115JA, it has been clearly stated that relief will be computed u/s 80HHC (3)/(3A), subject to the conditions under sub-sections (4) and (4A) of that Section.

The conditions are only that the relief should be certified by the Chartered Accountant. Such condition is not a qualifying condition, but, it is a compliance condition. Therefore, one cannot rely upon the last sentence in clause (iv) of Explanation to section 115JB (subject to the conditions specified in sub- section (4) and (4A) of that section) to obliterate the difference between eligibility and deductibility of profits as contended on behalf of the Department.

From the above observations, it is clear that the quantum of deduction u/s 80HHC under the provisions of Section 115JB will be limited to the relief certified by the Chartered Accountant and this is not a qualifying condition but it is a compliance condition.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI

ITA Nos. 4880 & 4881/Del/2011

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031