As from 1.4.2012 the determination of point of taxation is on the basis of invoices for large CA firms. For this several representations were made to CBEC requiring clarification of invoices issued on or before 31st March 2012 where the payment has not been received before 1st April 2012.
The petrol price was hiked today by a record Rs 7.54 per litre as rupee had a free fall, an unpopular decision that was attacked by allies of UPA government who demanded its immediate rollback holding it as unacceptable.
Prerequisite to generate Annexure in Tally. ERP9 for filing your EVAT Return- 1. Press F11 (Company Features) –> Statutory & Taxation. In the displayed window, fill in the VAT Registration Number in the ‘VAT TIN (Regular)’ field – 2. Download the e-return templates (i.e, FORM-231.xls, FORM-232.xls and FORM-CST.xls) from the Govt of Maharashtra website ( http://www.mahavat.gov.in ) and copy to Tally.ERP 9 installed folder.
TDS on the charges you pay to a Barber? The word ‘carrying out any work’ in section 194C is limited to any work which on being carried out culminates into a product or result. The word ‘work’ in s.194C is limited to doing something with a view to achieving the task undertaken or carry out an operation which produces some result. The facilities/amenities made available by a hotel to its customers is not covered under any of the categories specified in the term ‘work’ in Explanation III to section 194C; consequently, the Circular No.681, dated 08-03-1994 to the extent it holds that the services made available by a hotel to its customers are covered u/s 194C must be held to be bad in law.
We had many options to end our life Poison, Sleeping pills, Hanging, Jump from building, Sleep under a train.. But we choose the bravest… Education (CA).
You can now access your Credit Information Report (CIR) directly from CIBIL. As you may be aware, your CIBIL CIR is a factual record of your credit payment history compiled from information received from credit grantors. The purpose is to help credit grantors make informed lending decisions – quickly and objectively, and enable faster processing of your credit applications to help provide you speedier access to credit at better terms.
Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of CIT vs. Panchvati Motors (P) Ltd. in ITA No.292 of 2008, dated 3.05.2011 has held that in a case where no objection regarding valid service was taken before the completion of assessment, provisions of sec. 292BB will be applicable to all pending assessments as on 1.04.2008. Since the provisions of sec. 292BB(1) are applicable for Assessment Year in question as the proceedings were pending as on that date and the assessee had not raised any objection during the course of assessment proceedings and had participated in the assessment proceedings, the assessment cannot be annulled on the ground that valid notice u/s 143(2) was not served on the assessee. Accordingly in our considered opinion as held by the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Panchvati Motors (P) Ltd. (supra), assessment cannot be annulled.
With respect to assessment framed u/s 143(3) dated 30.11.2010, addition of Rs.1,32,52040/- was made, against which the assessee filed appeal and CIT(A) deleted such addition vide order dated 31.5.2011 against which the department filed appeal and Tribunal upheld the order of CIT(A) vide order dated 25.10.2011 in I.T.A No.3641/Del.2011 for assessment year 2008-09. Meanwhile, Assessing Officer passed another order u/s 154/143(3) on 3.2.2011 making the same addition, against which assessee filed appeal and CIT(A) deleted the impugned addition while following his earlier order dated 31.5.2011.
The order of Sh. K.S.Mohi basically implements the resolution of DDCA dated 1.3.2007 and on which aspect I have already commented above that there is absolutely no resolution whatsoever dated 1.3.2007 and if even there is such a resolution, the same will be an illegal resolution because the same amounts to an amendment of the Memorandum of Association or Rules without prior sanction/approval of the Central Government as required under Section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956, the license granted to the DDCA and as duly incorporated in Clause 4(vii) of the Memorandum of Association.Therefore, the order dated 12.4.2007 cannot bind the appellants/plaintiffs either on principle of res judicata or because there is no resolution dated 1.3.2007 of DDCA on which the order was passed, or on the ground even if there is a resolution dated 1.3.2007, the said resolution would be an illegal resolution in the absence of any prior sanction or approval from the Central Government.
The Central Bureau of Investigation has arrested an Assistant Commissioner, a Superintendent and an Inspector, all of Central Excise (Service Tax Department), Akurdi, Pune in a bribery case. A case was registered against the Superintendent and an Inspector, both of Central Excise (Service Tax), Akurdi, Pune on an alleged demand of bribery from the complainant for not levying service tax on his multi-purpose Hall.
