Follow Us:

No estoppels in law for correctness, inadvertently included comparable may be argued in later proceedings

December 19, 2015 949 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Delhi held In the case of Alcatel-Lucent Technologies. vs, DCIT that merely because the assessee in the TP study had included the comparable, which was accepted by TPO, it does not follow that the assessee cannot resile from its original claim at a later stage of proceeding

e-TDS/TCS RPU version 1.4 for Statement(s) from FY 2007-08 onwards released

December 19, 2015 3718 Views 0 comment Print

Key Features – Return Preparation Utility (RPU) version 1.4 ♠ Remark ‘B’ is made applicable for Section code 194DA for Form 26Q, FY 2015-16, Q3 onwards. ♠  Addition of challan (i.e. C9 correction) in correction statements: As directed by Income Tax Department (ITD), addition of challan option (i.e. is C9 correction) has been made available […]

NSDL releases New e-TDS/TCS File validation utility wef 19.12.2015

December 19, 2015 4407 Views 0 comment Print

e-TDS/TCS File validation utility (FVU) version 2.145 for FY 2007-08 to FY 2009-10 and 4.9 for FY 2010-11 onwards are released Key Features – File Validation Utility (FVU) version 2.145 ♠ Addition of challan (i.e. C9 correction) in correction statements: As directed by Income Tax Department (ITD), addition of challan option (i.e. is C9 correction) […]

Statutory Audit may be replaced by Forensic Audit

December 19, 2015 4630 Views 0 comment Print

Time is not far when Statutory Audits may be replaced by Forensic Audit and auditor will have to act as a bloodhound rather than a watchdog. Perhaps if the Auditors would have been given the rights and duties of a bloodhound as the CBI or such agencies have, no scams would have ever happened in the Financial World.

Exemption from Service Tax on Services Provided by Goods Transport Agency

December 19, 2015 40753 Views 0 comment Print

Serial No 21 of the Notification No 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012 provides for an exemption for services provided by Goods Transport Agency, by way of transport of goods carriage. The extract of clause, providing exemption as per Original Notification No 25/2012 dated 20.06.2012 (Applicable with effect from 01.07.2012) is narrated as under:-

Notification No. 992(E)/2015 – Income Tax Dated 18/12/2015

December 18, 2015 1123 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 992(E)/2015 – Income Tax G.S.R. 992(E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to article 309 of the Constitution and in supersession of the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Income Tax Department (Group C Posts), Recruitment Rules, 2003 relating to Staff Car Driver (Ordinary Grade) except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the President hereby makes

Tangible material required to reopen assessment u/s 148 of Income Tax Act,1961

December 18, 2015 2429 Views 0 comment Print

M/s.Peacock Apparels (P) Ltd vs. ITO (Madras High Court), Except to state that the EOU has not been approved by the Specific Authority, the first respondent has not assigned any other reason to reopen the assessment order.

Notification No. 990(E)- Income Tax, Dated: 18.12.2015

December 18, 2015 3481 Views 0 comment Print

Tax Assistant except as respects things done or omitted is be done before such supersession, the President hereby makes the following rules regulating the method oC recruitment to the posts of Tax Assistant in the Central Berard of Direct Taxes (CBDT), Derartrrient of Revenue, Ministry of Finance.

Mere transfer of unexpired contracts cannot be treated as Capital Expenditure

December 18, 2015 877 Views 0 comment Print

Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT observed that the assessee has acquired the service agreement whereby all the liabilities, rights and obligation and interest in the afore-stated agreement are acquired by the assessee.

Compulsory pre-emptive purchase not necessary in collaboration agreement between owner & developer

December 18, 2015 1817 Views 0 comment Print

In case of Unitech Ltd. Vs. UOI Hon’ble SC has set aside the order passed by Bombay HC in a writ petition filed by asseessee against the order under section 269UD. Hon’ble SC have held compulsory pre-emptive purchase illegal.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930