The Hon’ble CESTAT, Delhi held that the matter is no longer res integra as it has been consistently held that substantial benefit cannot be denied merely because some aspects of the procedure had not been followed.
It was held by the Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai that while the Department had opportunity to verify whatever information/ statements furnished by the Appellant, a copy of the verification report should have been provided to the Appellant to make their submissions/rebuttal.
In the instant case, AP. Engineers (the Assessee) filed a refund claim of Service tax which was rejected by the Adjudicating Authority as hit by doctrine of unjust enrichment. On appeal being made to the Commissioner (Appeals)
In order to avail Cenvat credit on outward transportation, any service received up to ‘the place of removal’ should qualify as input service under the definition of ‘input service’ as defined in Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 (the Credit Rules). Prior to July 11, 2014, the term, ‘place of removal’ was not […]
(i) In item (i), after the words and sanitation, the words including contribution to the Swach Bharat Kosh set-up by the Central Government for the promotion of sanitation shall be inserted; (ii) In item (iv), after the words and water, the words including contribution to the Clean Ganga Fund set-up by the Central Government for rejuvenation of river Ganga; shall be inserted.
We are sharing with you an important judgment of the Hon’ble CESTAT, Delhi in the case of Microsoft Corporation (I) (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, New Delhi [2014-TIOL-1964-CESTAT-DEL] on the following issue: Issue: Whether the services provided to principals situated outside India to market their products in India is an export of service […]
Serum Institute of India Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III [2014-TIOL-1887-CESTA T-MUM] Serum Institute of India Ltd. (“the Assessee”) is 100% EOU engaged in the manufacture of vaccine (human medicine) falling under Chapter Heading 30.02 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Assessee imported raw material without payment of duty (inputs) by availing […]
We are sharing with you an important judgment of the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of H.M. Singh & Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax [2014 (49) taxmann.com 417(Allahabad)] on the following issue: Issue: Whether penalty could be levied under Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 […]
Globe Agencies (the Assessee) purchased Valued Based Advance License (VABAL) from the market in respect of exported goods. Since, the Assessee failed to show that input stage credit has not been availed by the manufacturer of the exported (exempted) goods
Bharat Marine Co. (Petitioner) challenged the Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued by the Department on the ground that the contents of the SCN discloses a pre-conceived and closed mind. It was further contended that the findings of Revenue were categorical in nature
