Sahil Enterprises Vs Union of India (Tripura High Court) Hon’ble High Court of Tripura issued notice for the limited purpose of removing attachment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) ledger of assessee. Facts: Sahil Enterprises (Petitioner) has submitted that their ITC account is attached by Department on the ground that, supplier has not deposited the taxes […]
TAAR held that, Applicant is a government entity liable to TDS provisions u/s 51 of CGST Act, 2017 and is also liable to pay tax under RCM in respect of legal services received by them.
12% GST applicable on Manufacturing feeder, Drying machine, Cleaning & Grading Machine, Pre-stem remover and 18% GST on Automatic Weighing Machine In M/s. Wave Colour Techniks, [Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 29/2021 decided on June 07, 2021], M/s. Wave Colour Techniks (Applicants) has sought an advance ruling on the GST applicable on the machines namely […]
M/s. Forest County Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (Applicant) has sought an advance ruling on the issue of applicability of GST on Repair and Maintenance Fund and Sinking Fund and whether the exemption limit of Rs. 7500/- per member lies on these Funds in reference to Sr. No. 77 of Notification No. 12/2017 -Central Tax (Rate) dated June 28, 2017
If a statute provides an act to be done by a particular authority and in a particular manner, it should only be done by that authority and in that manner or not at all noted that the Respondent acted arbitrarily by withholding the refund without assigning any reason though the statute mandates for recording the same.
SC HELD in favour of Amazon in a case that pitched Amazon.Com against India’s original retail king Kishore Biyani’s Future Group and Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Retail, which is set to go big on e-commerce.
The Appellant contended that, being an LLP is not covered in definition of ‘body corporate’ and hence not liable to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism (RCM), as applicable to a body corporate in terms of Notification No. 30/2012-ST dated June, 2012.
ACIT Vs Krishan Lal Madhok (ITAT Delhi) A.C.I.T. on the basis of information received from the Government of France under the Double Taxation Avoidance Convention wrongfully assumed that Shri Krishan Lal Madhok was earning an interest at the rate of 4% from his foreign Swiss Bank account, thereby included the same in his income while […]
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s F1 Components Pvt. Ltd. v. The State Tax Officer, Chennai [W.P. No.6631 of 2021 And WMP No.7188 of 2021, dated July 09, 2021] partly set aside the order passed by the Revenue Department to the extent that interest on remittances by way of adjustment of […]
DCIT Vs Board of Cricket Control in India (ITAT Mumbai) Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax has challenged correctness of the order dated January 09, 2019 passed by CIT(A) quashing the reassessment order passed by the Appellant without issuance of notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act), for the assessment year […]
