The Court held that authorities must provide a personal hearing before issuing adverse GST orders under Section 73. Failure to follow Section 75(4) violates natural justice and renders the order unsustainable.
The Court will review whether ITC can be refused when the seller’s registration was valid on the transaction date but cancelled later. The case also highlights issues of natural justice and procedural fairness.
AAR rules that ITC is admissible on cables, switchyards, and related services used for electricity transmission to factory premises, even when installed outside.
AAR rules that blends of cotton seed oil cake and de-oiled cake retain original characteristics and must pay 5% GST, not exempt under cattle feed provisions.
The AAR held that invoice value applies for supplies to related persons eligible for full ITC, while unrelated supplies follow transaction value. Transportation services to unregistered persons were ruled exempt from GST.
Supreme Court declines judicial intervention in GST registration, emphasizing policy decisions rest with the government and legislature.
SC rules that land purchase and sale by developers constitute transfer of title, not taxable real estate services, dismissing the Revenue’s service tax demand.
High Court held that rewards under GST informer schemes are purely discretionary and cannot be claimed through mandamus. Informers have no right to challenge assessment or appellate orders.
The Court ruled that cotton seed oil cake remains exempt when used as cattle feed, even if sold through traders. Taxability depends on end use, not the supply route.
Blocking Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A without recording written reasons to believe is illegal, as per Allahabad High Court, reinforcing procedural safeguards in GST.
