HC Held that, no Service Tax can be levied on the activity of take-away of food items as it would amount to sale of goods wherein, element of service such as dining facility, washing area and clearing of the tables are not involved.
HC Held that, minor discrepancy in mentioning registration number of vehicle in e-way bill would not attract proceedings for penalty under Section 129 of CGST Act
Revenue Department had neither sought any new information nor made a reference to new material on record. Held that, a change in opinion that does not satisfy the jurisdictional foundation under Section 147 of the IT Act.
HC set aside penalty order passed by the Revenue Department on ground that order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice. Assessee was not afforded full opportunity to contest allegations against it. Set aside penalty order.
HC set aside the order for cancellation of GST Registration of the assessee passed by the Revenue Department on the ground that the order is not sustainable as the reply to SCN furnished by assessee was not taken into consideration by Revenue Department, directed the Revenue Department to restore the GST Registration of the assessee.
ITAT held that no tax would be levied on issue of shares to venture capital fund and further upheld observation of CIT(A) that, payment for valuation certification and retainership fees to a CA firm is a revenue expenditure.
HC quashed assessment order and consequential recovery notice issued by Revenue Department on the grounds that no opportunity of hearing was afforded to assessee and contentions of assessee were also not considered, thus same was a violation of principles of natural justice.
HC held that, pay roll related services outsourced to foreign company would be treated as business income earned by foreign company and not a technical service therefore, would not be liable for TDS
Mahajan Fabrics Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner CGST And Ors (Delhi High Court) The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in M/s. Mahajan Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, CGST and Ors. [W.P. (C) 6727/2022 dated February 6, 2023] has set aside the order passed by the Appellate Authority, disallowing the refund claimed by the assessee. Held that, the […]
CESTAT held that, SCN under Section 73(3) of CGST Ac was issued after Service Tax amount was paid by assessee, thus, demand for tax is not sustainable
