ITAT Ahmedabad held that disallowance of loss on share on mere conjecture and surmises is unsustainable as assessee duly submitted all the evidences.
ITAT Mumbai held that the interest income earned by a cooperative society on its investments held with a cooperative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under Sec.80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Chennai held that UPS and Printers being part of a computer systems and hence eligible for higher depreciation at the rate 60%
ITAT Delhi held that total allowance of the remuneration (including bonus) to the partners has to be within the permissible limit of provisions of section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court held that circular/ instruction no. 5051 dated 07.02.1991 states that prosecution normally be not initiated against a person who has attained the age of 70 years at the time of commission of offence. However, petitioner cannot be permitted to take benefit of Circular/ Instruction No. 5051 dated 07.02.1991 to find an escape route for the wrong committed by him.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that as assessment of shipping bills has attained finality, classification of goods cannot be questioned subsequently by the Customs.
Chhattisgarh High Court held that the prosecution has miserably failed to prove that the appellant possessed properties disproportionate to his known source of income. Accordingly, appellant is acquitted of the charge under Sections 13(1)(e) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and hence bail granted.
ITAT Mumbai held that Inland Haulage Charges forms part of income from operation of ships in international traffic and hence covered under Article-9 of India-France Tax Treaty is not taxable in India.
ITAT Mumbai held that interest income earned by co-operative society on its investment held with the co-operative bank would be eligible for claim of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that rejection of transaction value and enhancement of assessable value has to be on the basis of some evidence on record. Rejection of transaction value in absence of any evidence is untenable in law.
