ITAT Visakhapatnam held that addition towards unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act upheld since assessee company failed to substantiate identity and creditworthiness of lender.
NCLAT Delhi held that the admission of the Claim by the Resolution Professional in the first CIRP against the Corporate Debtor constituted a valid acknowledgement. Accordingly, order of adjudicating authority confirmed and appeals dismissed.
Delhi High Court held that person aggrieved by the provisional attachment order passed by the Adjudicating Authority should prefer an appeal to Appellate Tribunal under section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [PMLA]. Accordingly, writ petition disposed of.
Bombay High Court held that dispute between SEBI and petitioner regarding opening of Demat Account in fictitious and benami name and making of large applications in IPO is settled and the said dispute is predominantly commercial in nature having little criminal overtone. Hence, order quashed and set aside.
Allahabad High Court held that filing of writ petition only with intent to evade pre-deposit of 10% as provided in Goods and Services Tax Act is incorrect. Accordingly, petition is misconceived and is dismissed.
Gujarat High Court held that crude palm kernel oil edible grade eligible for exemption in terms of entry 33A/57 of exemption notification. Accordingly, show cause notice is quashed and set aside.
NCLAT Chennai held that suspended directors rightly directed to pay amount to liquidation estate of Corporate Debtor since evidence presented did substantiated the determination of fraudulent transaction as envisaged under Section 66 of the IBC.
Telangana High Court held that sale of undertaking as a going concern falls within the definition of a slump sale as set out in Section 2(42C) of the Income Tax Act hence section 41(2) dealing with taxation of gains on sale of certain depreciable assets doesn’t apply.
The Kerala High Court held that scrutiny of exempted trust returns was correctly conducted as complete scrutiny, allowing assessment of appropriation of receipts under Section 12A.
NCLAT Delhi held that penalty imposed by Competition Commission of India [CCI] of Rs. 213.14 crore upon Meta upheld on sharing WhatsApp user data with other Meta companies. Accordingly, appeal partly allowed.
