Madras High Court held that order of attachment of immovable property is required to be lifted as recovery officer is bound to give effect to order of higher authority. Accordingly, since entire arrears is already paid as per order passed by ITAT.
Rajasthan High Court held that rejection of tender bid due to non-filing of GSTR-3B return constitutes material deviation since filing of GSTR-3B is mandatory tender condition. Accordingly, writ petition dismissed.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that amount paid to clear mortgage/encumbrances on title of property is rightly claimed as deduction under section 48(1) of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, appeal of revenue is dismissed.
Gujarat High Court held that reassessment on the basis of information made available on Insight Portal without verification of information by jurisdictional Assessing Officer is invalid in law. Accordingly, writ disposed of.
Delhi High Court held that writ petition in cases involving large scale availment of Input Tax Credit [ITC] or evasion of payment of GST not entertained and court has relegated parties to appellate remedy.
Bombay High Court held that delay in filing of Form No. 9A due to first year of its introduction is genuine and hence the same is condoned. Further, also held that if delay is not condoned there will be genuine hardship to charitable trust.
ITAT Delhi held that reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, solely on the basis of information received, without application of mind is bad-in-law and liable to be quashed. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
ITAT Hyderabad held that ad hoc disallowance of commission expense cannot be sustained since assessee has substantiated commission payment with relevant evidence. Further, mere non-submission of certain bills and vouchers cannot be reason for ad hoc disallowance of land and development expenditure.
ITAT Bangalore held that mere delay in filing the return of income cannot be construed as a violation so grave as to justify cancellation of registration under Section 12AA(4). Delay in return was unintentional hence cancellation of registration u/s. 12AA not justified.
Telangana High Court held that amount paid towards cancellation of agreement is liable to be disallowed under section 48(i) of the Income Tax Act since the no condition was stipulated in original Memorandum of Understanding hence in absence of contractual obligation the disallowance of said amount is justified.
