Madras High Court held that granting third hearing mandatory when petitioner has specifically sought for the same. Order set aside and matter remanded back since third hearing not granted.
During the relevant period, the petitioner filed its return and paid the appropriate taxes. While scrutinizing the petitioner’s monthly return, it was noticed that there was mismatch between GSTR-01 and GSTR-3B/GSTR-2A/2B.
As CIT(E) noticed some inconsistencies in the details submitted by the assessee, a show-cause notice was issued to the assessee why the application in Form 10AB should not be rejected.
ITAT Ahmedabad imposed cost of Rs. 10,000 on the assessee due to non-compliance with the show cause notice and directed to restore the matter back to the file of Jurisdictional Assessing Officer.
ITAT Surat held that the Fixed Deposits can be treated as stock-in-trade if it forms part of banking business. Further, held that deposits that forms part of banking business, write off such loss will be a loss arising in the course of carrying on banking business.
Delhi High Court held that once the settlement is reached, the substratum of the proceedings itself no longer exists, thus Competition Commission of India [CCI] proceedings cannot continue and deserves to be disposed of.
ITAT Kolkata held that in terms of block assessment under section 153A of the Income Tax Act, reopening of unabated assessment without any incriminating material found with respect to concerned assessment year is impermissible in law.
Madras High Court held that assessee is directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax amount since the assessee was unable to access GST portal and respond to the notice issued. Accordingly, appeal disposed of.
Madras HC held that passing of order without providing opportunity of personal hearing is against principles of natural justice. Accordingly, order set aside and directed to provide an opportunity to the Petitioner to establish their case on merits.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition u/s. 68 towards amount received as gift from son not justified since addition is made in a baseless manner, solely relying on unverified newspaper reports. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
