Madras High Court directed to grant an opportunity of being heard on payment of 25% of disputed taxes in the case of fraudulent availment of input tax credit on the basis of bogus invoices.
Delhi High Court held that clause (b) of Section 148A of the Income Tax Act does not stipulate that the Assessee is required to be provided minimum of seven working days. Accordingly, petition held to be unmerited and hence disposed of.
Madras High Court held that GST demand on account of mismatch between Form 26AS and GSTR 2B is liable to be set aside on payment of 25% of pre-deposit. Accordingly, opportunity of being heard will be granted on payment of directed pre-deposit.
NCLAT Chennai held that order not falling under Part II of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC] is not appealable under section 61 of the IBC and accordingly appeal dismissed as not maintainable.
ITAT Jaipur held that taxability of surrendered undisclosed income under section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act requires verification on the part of the AO. Accordingly, matter restored back to the file of AO.
ITAT Mumbai held that in the matter of adjustment of seized cash against self-assessment tax liability restored the matter back to file of AO for re-verification of application filed by the assessee. Accordingly, appeal partly allowed.
Andhra Pradesh High Court held the supply of the Solar generating Power Station, is a composite supply, it would not amount to a works contract. Accordingly, appeal allowed GST @5% is leviable on the same.
NCLAT Chennai held that rejection of application justified since disputed property claimed by the appellant will remain part of Corporate Debtor assets during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] proceedings.
Madras High Court held that exemption to sale of Gloriosa Superba under Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax [TNVAT] will be available to interstate transaction in absence of specific notification issued under section 8(5) of CST Act.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that action of the department already taken under section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 doesn’t restrain GST authorities from conducting audit. Accordingly, writ dismissed.
