Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subramani Babu Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Subramani Babu Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court) Madras High Court held that GST demand on account of mismatch between Form 26AS and GSTR 2B is liable to be set aside on payment of 25% of pre-deposit. Accordingly, opportunity of being heard will be granted on payment of directed pre-deposit. Facts- The petitioner is registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. During the relevant period 2018-19, the petitioner filed its returns and paid the appropriate taxes. However, on comparison of the taxable supplies reported by the petitioner in the GSTR 3B returns with Form 26...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930