ITAT Delhi held that orders passed based on illegal assumption of jurisdiction on the basis of satisfaction note which was recorded without application of mind and quite in a mechanical manner is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, addition deleted.
Supreme Court held that the National Commission had no jurisdiction to re-write the terms of the contract entered between the banks and the credit cardholders, which the parties have mutually agreed to be bound by.
ITAT Mumbai held that assessee has submitted all the necessary details in terms of purchase bills, transportation bills, confirmed copy of accounts and payment are made through cheques, hence disallowance of such purchases is not justified.
Kerala High Court held that time limit for furnishing GST return under section 39 for the month of September is to be treated as 30th November in each financial year with effect from 01.07.2017. ITC to be claimed accordingly.
ITAT Chennai Held that the construction of a new residential house to its existing residence with separate stair-case, kitchen, new electrical connection, water connection, etc. qualifies for deduction u/s.54F of the Act. Accordingly, deduction u/s. 54F granted.
NCLAT Delhi held that benefit of extension of limitation under section 19 of the Limitation Act entitled to the operational creditor since last payment was made within period of three years and the same was acknowledged in writing by Corporate Debtor.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that provisions of Sick Industrial Companies Act [SICA] would override the provisions of Income Tax Act. Thus, set off of business loss granted on the basis of Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction [BIFR] order.
ITAT Delhi held that rejection of application for registration u/s. 12AB of the Income Tax Act by CIT(Exemptions) without considering replies and explanations furnished by the applicant is not justified. Accordingly, matter remitted back for fresh consideration.
Delhi High Court held that income tax authorities cannot retain seized cash once time period for framing an assessment under section 153A of the Income Tax Act has expired and there is no outstanding demand. Accordingly, petition disposed of.
Supreme Court held that the reduction in share capital of the subsidiary company results into the transfer of capital asset as envisaged in section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, petition of revenue dismissed.
