Orissa High Court held that a party cannot be permitted to take inconsistent stand at different stages of the proceeding. Thus, contention that Fe content in IOF is to require to be determined on the basis of Dry Metric Ton [DMT] and not Wet Metric Ton [WMT] cannot be sustained.
ITAT Ahmedabad application for registration of trust under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act since object of the applicant is not working for benefit of general public at large but is working for specific section of society. Accordingly, appeal of assessee dismissed.
The Ld. AR requested that the matter may be remitted to the Ld. AO while the Ld. DR supported the order of the Ld. CIT(A). After considering the facts of the case, we deem it appropriate in the interest of justice and fair play that another opportunity needs to be provided to the assessee to represent her case properly before the Ld.
CESTAT Chennai held that CENVAT Credit in respect of service tax paid on input services i.e. Management or Business Consultant’s Service’ and ‘Business Support Service’ is duly eligible. Accordingly, disallowance of credit set aside.
Madras High Court held that provisions of section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with rule 36(4) of the Central Goods and Services Rules, 2017 are not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, writ petition dismissed.
ITAT Jaipur held that delayed filing of Form No. 67 cannot be reason for denial of Foreign Tax Credit since filing of Form 67 is procedural/ directory requirement. Accordingly, appeal allowed and order of CIT(A) set aside.
CESTAT Delhi held that regulation 10(n) doesn’t require Customs Broker to keep continuous surveillance on client to ensure that client operates from that address and has not changed his operations. Accordingly, order revoking customs broker license set aside.
ITAT Mumbai held that denial of exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act not justified since previous registration u/s. 12A continued to be valid till grant of provisional registration under the new scheme u/s. 12AB of the Income Tax Act.
The petitioner is a partnership firm and is registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017/Assam Goods and Services Tax (AGST) Act, 2017. Show cause notice was issued due to non-filing of GST returns for a continuous period of six months.
ITAT Delhi held that approval granted under section 151 of the Income Tax Act in mechanical manner without application of mind hence reopening of assessment based on such mechanical order is liable to be quashed.
