Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Brightline (C&F) Agency Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brightline (C&F) Agency Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) CESTAT Delhi held that regulation 10(n) doesn’t require Customs Broker to keep continuous surveillance on client to ensure that client operates from that address and has not changed his operations. Accordingly, order revoking customs broker license set aside. Facts- The order-in-original dated 15.06.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Airport & General), New Delhi is assailed by M/s Brightline (C&F) Agency as its customs broker licence was revoked, the security deposit of Rs. 75,000/- was forfeited and the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930