Case Law Details
Case Name : Brightline (C&F) Agency Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brightline (C&F) Agency Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi)
CESTAT Delhi held that regulation 10(n) doesn’t require Customs Broker to keep continuous surveillance on client to ensure that client operates from that address and has not changed his operations. Accordingly, order revoking customs broker license set aside.
Facts- The order-in-original dated 15.06.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Airport & General), New Delhi is assailed by M/s Brightline (C&F) Agency as its customs broker licence was revoked, the security deposit of Rs. 75,000/- was forfeited and the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

