This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Mistake by counsel: ITAT condoned delay on Precedent in Penalty Case
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Mukesh Mittal Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2005-06
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chandigarh
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Mukesh Mittal Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh Bench, has remanded two appeals filed by assessee Mukesh Mittal back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. The appeals concerned penalties levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2007-08 and 2009-10. The primary issue before the ITAT was the CIT(A)’s refusal to condone a significant delay in filing the appeals.
The Assessing Officer (AO) had imposed penalties after making additions to Mittal’s income following ...






