Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Mistake by counsel: ITAT condoned delay on Precedent in Penalty Case

Case Law Details

Case Name
Mukesh Mittal Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2005-06
Advertisement Mukesh Mittal Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh Bench, has remanded two appeals filed by assessee Mukesh Mittal back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. The appeals concerned penalties levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2007-08 and 2009-10. The primary issue before the ITAT was the CIT(A)’s refusal to condone a significant delay in filing the appeals. The Assessing Officer (AO) had imposed penalties after making additions to Mittal’s income following ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,736

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *