Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chemangattu Jose John Vs DCIT (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chemangattu Jose John Vs DCIT (ITAT Cochin) Higher actual sale consideration Vs Lesser in registered sale deed- No unexplained Income- Addition u/s 69A deleted- ITAT Cochin Assessee sold two agricultural properties, the actual sale consideration of which was Rs.34 lakhs though as per registered deeds, the sale consideration was Rs.15.59 lakhs. AO made  treated Rs 18.41 lakhs as  unexplained  & made addition  u/s 69A on the ground that  assessee failed to give satisfactory reply. CIT(A) upheld the order of AO. Before the Tribunal,  Assesee argued that he  had no control over the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Agricultural Land Also Covered by Section 56(2)(x) – ITAT Upholds Addition Based on DVO Valuation WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031