Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chemangattu Jose John Vs DCIT (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chemangattu Jose John Vs DCIT (ITAT Cochin) Higher actual sale consideration Vs Lesser in registered sale deed- No unexplained Income- Addition u/s 69A deleted- ITAT Cochin Assessee sold two agricultural properties, the actual sale consideration of which was Rs.34 lakhs though as per registered deeds, the sale consideration was Rs.15.59 lakhs. AO made  treated Rs 18.41 lakhs as  unexplained  & made addition  u/s 69A on the ground that  assessee failed to give satisfactory reply. CIT(A) upheld the order of AO. Before the Tribunal,  Assesee argued that he  had no control over the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031