Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Reconciliation mut Before Denying TDS for Discrepancy Between 26AS & Return Receipts

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 3968
Case Name
Jagannath Transport Corporation Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2023-24
Advertisement


Jagannath Transport Corporation Vs DCIT (ITAT Raipur)

ITAT Raipur held that denial of TDS claimed based on difference between gross turnover as per 26AS and total receipts reflected in returns, without verifying reconciliation prepared by assessee, is not justified. Hence, matter restored to CIT(A).

Facts- While processing the return of assessee, the same was considered defective by the CPC and notice u/s 139(9) was issued on 13.02.2024, stating that the gross receipts of assessee reflecting in Form 26AS, on which credit for TDS has been claimed, are higher than the total of the receipts shown under all heads of income, in the return of income. Thus, while credit for TDS is being claimed, the corresponding receipts are not offered in the respective income schedules, to arrive at the taxable total income. Accordingly, the TDS credit granted to assessee was computed and has been reduced to Rs. 1,26,52,567/- as against of Rs.1,49,62,620/- claimed by the assessee in its return income. Consequently, the refund amount claimed by the assessee has been reduced to Rs. 23,10,053/-.

CIT(A) dismissed the appeal. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed.

Conclusion- Held that on perusal of the findings of Ld. CIT(A), it is found that the assessee had made explanatory submissions and reply before the First Appellate Authority, however, the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) was without verifying the facts by himself or through the Ld. AO, therefore, in the interest of justice, the reconciliation prepared and submitted by the assessee before us, needs further verification by the revenue authorities. Consequently, the matter deserves to be restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(A), who had decided the issue without adhering to the provisions of section 250(4) & (6).

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.