Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajkumar Laxminarayan Kanojiya Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 1617/Mum/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/05/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rajkumar Laxminarayan Kanojiya Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

I hold that CPC has no jurisdiction of adjustment u/s. 143(1) on this issue where admittedly there were decisions in favour of the assessee from the Hon’ble High Courts

Facts-

In this case adjustment was done by CPC, Bengaluru under section 143(1) of the I.T. Act disallowing payment of PF & ESIC amounting to Rs. 18,31,226/-.

Upon assessee’s appeal NFAC confirmed the same. Against this order the assessee is in appeal before the ITAT.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031