Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajkumar Laxminarayan Kanojiya Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rajkumar Laxminarayan Kanojiya Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

I hold that CPC has no jurisdiction of adjustment u/s. 143(1) on this issue where admittedly there were decisions in favour of the assessee from the Hon’ble High Courts

Facts-

In this case adjustment was done by CPC, Bengaluru under section 143(1) of the I.T. Act disallowing payment of PF & ESIC amounting to Rs. 18,31,226/-.

Upon assessee’s ap

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31