In re Shailesh Ramsunder Pande (GST AAR Maharashtra)
Iin the instant case, the applicant has an agreement with RIPL for supplying Non-AC buses to transport staff of RIPL and the buses are owned by the applicant. Further, the applicant also incurs expenses on fuel and maintenance of the buses and for all these services provided by the applicant, they are paid fixed hire cost plus fixed fuel cost at predetermined rates of fuel plus mileage.
We also find that it is RIPL which controls the deployment of the buses. A perusal of the agreement reveals that the applicant shall deploy the buses (already inspected by RIPL) or as per instructions of the Admn. Dept, of RIPL. Thus the applicant cannot run the buses on their own because the overall control of the buses is with RIPL. Further, as per the agreement, Insurance Charges, etc., will be paid by the applicant whereas toll tax, etc will be paid by RIPL. Thus while the ownership of the buses lies with the applicant, the buses shall be operated strictly as per the instructions of RIPL. Therefore in the subject case, there is a clear transfer of right to use the buses by way of effective control as is seen from the fact that the buses are plying strictly as per RIPL’s instructions.
