Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Service Tax

Service Tax Not Payable Due to Cost-Sharing Without Service Element in Advertisement Expenses: CESTAT Chennai

Case Law Details

Case Name
Panasonic Home Appliances India Co. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Panasonic Home Appliances India Co. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) The appeal arose from an order confirming service tax demands on the appellant under the category of “Business Auxiliary Service” (BAS) for advertisement and sales promotion activities undertaken in India. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing and trading household appliances and related products, had entered into an agreement with its foreign group company for advertising and promoting certain products. Under this agreement, the appellant incurred promotional expenses i...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,789

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *