Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bajaj International Realty Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bajaj International Realty Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) Wrong Section (69A vs 68) Not Fatal – Accommodation Entry Addition Sustained by ITAT Assessee received loan of ₹20.52 lakh from Aneri Fincap Ltd.. AO treated it as unexplained u/s 69A based on investigation linking lender to accommodation entries. CIT(A) upheld addition along with commission u/s 69C & interest disallowance u/s 37. ITAT held: Loan was recorded in books → proper section is 68 (not 69A) However, wrong section does not invalidate addition if substance is clear Entire enquiry revolved around identity, creditworthi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Specific Performance Denied for Failure to Prove Continuous Readiness & Willingness Despite Suit Being Within Limitation-Supreme Court Pune ITAT Refuses to Condon 661-Day Delay Over Vague Claims Pune ITAT: ₹10 Lakh Addition Deleted Over Weak Cash Payment Evidence Pune ITAT: Section 263 Revision Invalid After AO’s Proper Enquiry Mumbai ITAT: Absence of Expenditure Alone Cannot Be a Ground to Deny Renewal of Registration Under Section 12AB View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930