Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amit Bholanath Mishra Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amit Bholanath Mishra Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 50 Not Invocable Without Depreciation: ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹57.62 Lakh Addition on Sale of Cars The Mumbai ITAT (A-Bench) allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2016-17, holding that Section 50 cannot be applied in the absence of any depreciation actually allowed on the assets. The assessee had sold two motor cars and claimed set-off of capital losses against long-term capital gains from sale of flats. The AO recomputed depreciation for earlier years, invoked Explanation 6 to Section 43(6), treated the cars as depreciable business assets, a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930