Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amit Bholanath Mishra Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amit Bholanath Mishra Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 50 Not Invocable Without Depreciation: ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹57.62 Lakh Addition on Sale of Cars The Mumbai ITAT (A-Bench) allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2016-17, holding that Section 50 cannot be applied in the absence of any depreciation actually allowed on the assets. The assessee had sold two motor cars and claimed set-off of capital losses against long-term capital gains from sale of flats. The AO recomputed depreciation for earlier years, invoked Explanation 6 to Section 43(6), treated the cars as depreciable business assets, a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930