Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sriram Srinivasan Vs JCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sriram Srinivasan Vs JCIT (ITAT Chennai) 5 Day Delay, No Notarised Affidavit— Technical Lapse Proves Fatal- :ITAT Chennai Declines to Admit BMA Appeal The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT, Chennai against the order of CIT(A)-18 dated 26.02.2025 relating to AY 2022-23, under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income & Assets) Act, 2015. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 22.09.2025, no one appeared on behalf of the assessee, nor was any adjournment request filed. The hearing notice sent by the Tribunal returned unserved, endorsed “no such person”, & no updated ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031