The Kolkata ITAT held that a commercial loan repaid within the same financial year along with interest and TDS compliance could not be treated as a bogus accommodation entry under Section 68. The Tribunal ruled that documentary evidence and banking transactions established the genuineness of the loan.
ROC Patna penalized a company and its managing director for non-filing of annual return for FY 2018-19. The order highlights strict enforcement of Section 92 compliance under the Companies Act, 2013.
The Registrar of Companies held that continued non-filing of annual return violated Section 92(4) of the Companies Act, leading to penalties on both the company and its managing director.
ROC Patna penalized a company and its managing director for failure to file annual returns under Sections 92(4) and 92(5) of the Companies Act, 2013. The order highlights strict consequences for continued annual compliance defaults.
ROC Patna imposed penalties on a Nidhi company and its Managing Director for failure to file the annual return under Section 92 of the Companies Act, 2013. The annual return remained unfiled despite issuance of adjudication notice and hearing opportunity.
ROC Patna penalized a company and its Managing Director for failing to file the annual return for FY 2023-24. The order highlights strict enforcement of Section 92 compliance under the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Patna imposed penalty under Section 92(5) after the company failed to file its annual return for FY 2019-20. The authority also noted absence of representation during adjudication proceedings.
ROC Mumbai-II imposed penalty under Section 450 after a company incorrectly mentioned the AGM date in Form AOC-4 XBRL. The order held the director responsible for ensuring accuracy of e-form contents.
