The authority evaluates the applicant’s claim that its proposed transportation model involves GTA services. It agrees, noting that issuance of a consignment note and assumption of delivery liability indicate GTA classification. Consequently, services to unregistered customers through e-commerce platforms fall under the GST exemption.
The Tribunal ruled that the entity did not qualify as an educational institution or as substantially government-financed, leading to denial of Section 10(23C)(iiiab) exemption. The dispute over taxing gross receipts was remanded for a fresh decision. Key takeaway: fund management alone cannot justify exemption.
This guide highlights the biggest valuation errors, from outdated financials to ignoring qualitative factors, and shows how to avoid costly mistakes that affect investors, regulators, and growth opportunities.
The Tribunal held that additions based solely on earlier-year assumptions cannot sustain without year-specific evidence. It found no material to show that current-year sales or debtors were bogus. The takeaway is that assessments must be supported by concrete evidence, not presumptions.
ITAT Mumbai deleted Section 69 additions as the Revenue relied only on uncorroborated statements and pen-drive data from third parties, violating natural justice. Suspicion alone cannot justify tax additions.
SC upheld the view that claimed liabilities towards two banks were unsubstantiated. The ruling reinforces the need for documentary verification of liabilities.
The Court held that dividend income, bank-deposit interest, and SDF service charges are not derived from long-term finance. Only direct lending profits qualify for the deduction.
Delhi High Court set aside the GST SCN and consequent order after petitioner was not given a proper opportunity to file a reply or attend a personal hearing. Matter remanded for fresh adjudication.
The Delhi High Court remanded the GST SCN for Financial Year 2019-20 after petitioner failed to respond due to consultant oversight. Costs of Rs. 20,000 were imposed, with the matter to be reconsidered after personal hearing.
The Supreme Court held that the corporate debtor’s alleged pre-existing dispute lacked any factual basis and reinstated NCLT’s CIRP admission. The ruling reaffirms that illusory or unsupported defences cannot defeat a Section 9 IBC claim.
