Understand the process of GST intimation in Form DRC-01A, issued for tax discrepancies. Learn about the parts of DRC-01A, applicable sections, and the response procedure.
Learn about the key features of EPFO 3.0, including instant withdrawals, mobile access, and faster claim settlements. Understand how this new system impacts employees and employers.
Learn difference between mandatory CSR and voluntary charitable donations under Companies Act, 2013. Understand compliance requirements and their legal implications.
SEBI has updated the Investor Protection and Education Fund Regulations, 2009, to include funds from certain delisting processes as a new source for the fund.
Where there exist conflicting test reports regarding conformity of imported goods to standards, the proper course was to allow the importer to respond to the show cause notice with all supporting documents, and for the authority to decide after affording a hearing whether provisional release under Section 110A could be granted.
SEBI levied a ₹600,000 penalty on Eqwires Research Analyst for acting as an unregistered investment advisor and making false claims. The firm also failed to provide mandatory disclosures and handled client accounts, violating SEBI regulations.
Where CoC, in exercise of its commercial wisdom, rejected all resolution plans and approved liquidation with 100% voting share, NCLT must order liquidation of the Corporate Debtor under Section 33(2) of IBC.
Assessee could not file GST returns under Section 39(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 for about six months due to reasons beyond control, but was willing to comply with all pending formalities under Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Bombay Chartered Accountants Society (BCAS) urges the government to implement next-generational GST reforms, focusing on structural changes, rate rationalization, and simplification of compliance for taxpayers.
Conversion of MEIS shipping bills to the DEPB scheme was permissible where bills not ‘free shipping bills as the scale of examination under both schemes was similar and the non-examination of goods could not be attributed to the assessee.
